Critical Race Theorists Draw Inaccurate Conclusions from the Facts (Part 3 of Series)

by | Sep 19, 2020

In part one of our series on Critical Race Theory (CRT), I discussed how Christians often wrongly frame questions around CRT as an all-or-nothing proposition. In part two, I pointed out ways critical race theorists help us understand the history of racism in America and the role Christians have played. That’s where I want to pick up—let’s examine and evaluate the claims of a few critical race theorists. It bears repeating that CRT is a diverse field, and not everyone in the field makes these claims.

Generally speaking, critical studies proceed through three steps. Step one is to gather facts, step two is to draw conclusions based on those facts, and step three is to propose or implement solutions. From what I’ve read by critical race theorists, my confidence in their work generally diminishes with each step. Let’s look at two conclusions reached by critical race theorists:

 

Conclusion Number One: Christianity Invented Racism

The critical theorist looks at the history of America and sees Christians responsible for racism at every step. At one level, I do not dispute that. The racism in our history as Christians is to our deep shame. Acts of racism by Christians lie about the character of the God we serve. However, while we agree that Christians have been responsible for acts of racism, it is too far to say that Christianity invented racism, or even the American version of it. Critical race theorist Rebecca Anne Goetz argues as much in her celebrated book, The Baptism of Early Virginia (1).

I disagree with her, but I can see how she got there. If someone views religion as a sociological phenomena, it makes sense that if Christians are consistently involved in racism in history, they might be responsible. Rather than reflexibly object and call the claim ridiculous, as Christians on social media are wont to do, why not sit with the claim to see if it has any merit at all? Have Christians been responsible for racism? Sadly, yes. Solely responsible? No. But if the world thinks that way, it is important for our witness to have an answer to that claim, and we need a better answer than falsely claiming we have been right all along.

 

Conclusion Number Two: Racism is Permanent

Critical race theorist Derrick Bell looks at the way the South organized after losing the Civil War to disenfranchise black people. He provides penetrating insight into the American psyche and offers compelling examples of how racism persists throughout history. I cannot disagree with him up to this point, and I would do well to consider these facts that make me uncomfortable about my country. But he draws the conclusion from this set of facts that racism is a permanent fact of history which cannot be changed given the power structures that exist. All apparent advancements against structural racism are a sham (2).

As a Christian, I have to disagree with that conclusion. Jesus reigns. All authority in heaven or on earth has been given to him (Matthew 28:19). It has been this hope which has kept so many in the black church working to fight racism for so many years, and God has blessed those efforts. Because the Lord reigns, racism is not inevitable. Perfect justice will be established forever when our King returns, but God’s people have always been those who dare to hope in justice now.

 

Proposed Solutions

The final step for critical race theorists is determining what should be done about racism. If racism is Christianity’s invention and if racism is permanent according to the power structures which enable it, as these two scholars posit, then the solution to racism is to tear down the existing power structures which have created a racist society. That means Christianity has to go. So-called traditional values have to go. The deeper you go, the more that has to come down. This kind of thinking has become so mainstream that a US governmental agency recently suggested that monotheism and the “Protestant work ethic” create racist social norms.

We could be reflexively outraged. Many Christians were. But it is better to take the time to see how this view developed in scholarship. It came about through a set of facts we agree on—that Christians, particularly ones who claimed to be Bible-believing, perpetuated racism for years. It is too simplistic to claim that these were the only ones perpetuating racism, but the fact that others were doing it does not absolve the people of faith.

We need answers for how Christians were so often so wrong on race. We need to come up with solutions for racism rather than leaving that work to those who believe that our very faith is responsible for the problems we face. And we need the humility—as those who have grown up within those tribes—to acknowledge that we might have persisting blind spots. In terms of engagement with critical race theorists and their field, that humility will be the subject of the final post in this series.

 


  • (1)  Her examination of conversion & baptism laws vis a vis slavery in early America is as meticulous as it is depressing. She concludes with this analysis: “This story is one of transformation, from an early seventeenth-century understanding of Christianity that stressed its universality to a mid-eighteenth-century understanding that stressed its exclusivity…English people struggled to explain the differences they observed between themselves and Africans and Indians, and they saw religion as a way of articulating and explaining those differences. The qualities they assigned to themselves as Christians, as well as the rights and freedoms they believed derived from their Christianity divided them from Indians and Africans.” Rebecca Anne Goetz, The Baptism of Early Virginia. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2012), 169-170
  • (2) “We rise and fall less as a result of our efforts than in response to the needs of a white society that condemns all blacks to quasi citizenship as surely as it segregated our parents and enslaved their forebears. The fact is that, despite what we designate as progress wrought through struggle over many generations, we remain what we were in the beginning: a dark and foreign presence, always the designated ‘other.’ Tolerated in good times, despised when things go wrong, as a people we are scapegoat and sacrificed as distraction or catalyst for compromise to facilitate resolution of political differences or relieve economic adversity.” Derrick Bell, Faces at the Bottom of the Well. (New York: Hachette Book Group, 1992), 12-13.

 


Click for part one, part two, or part four of this series.


 

Prayer Requests:

  1. Lament so much racism by Christians that lends credence to these faulty conclusions.
  2. Pray that God purge his church of all ethnic partiality.
  3. Pray that Christians would be interested in pursuing good solutions to racism rather than just decrying solutions we disagree with.

 

Recent POdcasts

Biblical Theology: Exodus

Biblical Theology: Exodus

We continue our Bible study series by looking at the book of Exodus. There are many ethnic issues in this book, from the oppression of the Israelites by the Egyptians, to the covenant faithfulness of Zipporah. This was a fascinating discussion and we hope you are...

read more
Biblical Theology: Genesis

Biblical Theology: Genesis

We are kicking off our Bible Study or Biblical Theology series with the book of Genesis. Adrianna Anderson brings her expertise as a Bible scholar to help us look at Scripture to see God's plan for diversity and ethnic harmony. There is so much in Scripture on this...

read more

Upcoming Events

Isaac-Adams-United-We-Pray-speaking-at-an-event

Click Here to View Now

Recent Articles

Presidents’ Day and Godly Authority

Presidents’ Day and Godly Authority

On Monday, our nation observed Presidents’ Day. This holiday gives us an opportunity to honor the role and office of President in our country. It also serves as an opportunity to reflect how we as Christians can pray for those who represent us as citizen servants in...

read more
Anthropology and Antisemitism

Anthropology and Antisemitism

Antisemitism is back in the news. Multiple presidents of prominent universities were recently summoned to Congress to testify about a rise in antisemitic incidents on their campuses. Their refusal to answer questions about whether antisemitism violates school policies...

read more
Dear White Woman

Dear White Woman

I don’t run at night or before the sun comes up. I wonder if you don’t either. While my husband can strap on a headlamp and reflectors and hit the neighborhood running, I have to be more cautious—even in the suburbs. Common sense tells women that running in the dark...

read more

We’d love to hear what you think about this article. Submit your feedback by clicking here to contact us.

Author

  • Austin Suter

    Austin is the executive director and editor for U?WP. He is a husband, father and seminary student at RTS Charlotte. Austin is a member at Iron City Church in Birmingham, AL. @amsuter

Related Articles

Dear White Woman

Dear White Woman

Courtney Reissig shares her experience of choosing to run at specific times of day in order to stay safe. She reflects on her own privilege and how she might leverage that in service of her minority brothers and sisters.

read more

Stay Connected